McDonald’s & Monopsony: The Seventh Circuit Vacates District Court’s Dismissal of a Per Se No-Poach Theory

By: Molly Donovan (The Antitrust Attorney)
In a decisive victory for per se no-poach claims, the Seventh Circuit, in a written opinion by Judge Easterbrook, overturned a district court’s dismissal of a Sherman Act, Section 1 no-poach claim against McDonald’s. The case centers around previous standard clauses in McDonald’s franchise agreements that prohibited one franchise from recruiting employees from another. The plaintiff argues that these anticompetitive clauses unreasonably restricted her from changing franchises to accept a higher-paying position.
The relevant contract language was broad and encompassed solicitation and hiring, remaining in effect for six months after the termination of employment: “Throughout this Franchise agreement, the Franchisee is prohibited from employing or attempting to employ any individual currently employed by McDonald’s, its subsidiaries, or by anyone operating a McDonald’s restaurant at that time, or otherwise enticing such individuals to leave their current employment. This provision will not be considered a violation if the individual has been out of the employment of the aforementioned parties for a duration exceeding six (6) months.”
The restriction was enforced, with an initial violation allowing McDonald’s to deny consent for a franchise transfer. Subsequent breaches granted McDonald’s the authority to terminate the franchise.
Furthermore, the plaintiffs contended that this restraint encouraged collusion among franchisees, as they were aware that each had agreed to the same provision. By refraining from employee poaching, franchisees could maintain wages below market standards, thereby undermining fair competition…
Featured News
Canada’s Competition Bureau Sues DoorDash Over Alleged Hidden Fees
Jun 10, 2025 by
CPI
Cornerstone Research Bolsters Competition Team with Industry Veteran
Jun 10, 2025 by
CPI
Axiom Integrates AI Platform Legora for Legal Document Review
Jun 10, 2025 by
CPI
Possible Delay in Implementing EU AI Act Now Formally on the Table
Jun 10, 2025 by
CPI
Anti–Rent Fixing Legislation Fails After Governor’s Veto
Jun 10, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
CPI
Industrial Strategy and the Role of Competition – Taking a Business Lens
May 21, 2025 by
Marcus Bokkerink
Industrial Policy, Antitrust, and Economic Growth: Some Observations
May 21, 2025 by
David S. Evans
Bolder by Design: Crafting Pro-Competitive Industrial Policies For Complex Challenges
May 21, 2025 by
Antonio Capobianco & Beatriz Marques
Competition-Friendly Industrial Policy
May 21, 2025 by
Philippe Aghion, Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros